tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22925401.post1399284495857620972..comments2023-08-11T08:21:09.562-06:00Comments on A Very Remote Period Indeed: 170,000 year-old human skull fragment found at LazaretJulien Riel-Salvatorehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05344338385695383003noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22925401.post-80678050486949679872011-08-26T11:29:37.929-06:002011-08-26T11:29:37.929-06:00CAG -
thanks for the comment. I agree with you tha...CAG -<br />thanks for the comment. I agree with you that this is very likely to fall within the <i>heidelbergensis</i> range of variation, and that the use of <i>H. erectus</i> in this report is maybe slightly outdated terminology. In any case, now we must wait to see an actual analysis of the thing before we can know either way. <br /><br />JRSJulien Riel-Salvatorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05344338385695383003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22925401.post-53839642468676359802011-08-25T23:56:44.221-06:002011-08-25T23:56:44.221-06:00It's very interesting, this article touches on...It's very interesting, this article touches on the taxonomic uncertainty quite unintentionally. http://www.rivieratimes.com/index.php/provence-cote-dazur-article/items/neanderthal-skull-fragment-discovered-in-nice-6698.html.<br /><br />I guess I fall in the H. Heidelbergensis camp via H antessesor, so I'd like to know on what criteria they made the H erectus attribution. If it truly Camarchgradnoreply@blogger.com